Garlands 1906

Garlands 1906
Showing posts with label Westmorland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Westmorland. Show all posts

Friday, 7 February 2020

Work related worry in the nineteenth century asylum

Last year, 54% of all working days lost were attributed to conditions caused by work related stress, and increasingly, pressure due to overwork is inducing bouts of mental ill health among workers.[1] However, the impact of overwork on an individual’s mental health is not a phenomenon consigned to recent decades. This post details three cases that demonstrate how work was found to impact patients in the archives of the Garlands Asylum, in an attempt to link our experiences with those confined in lunatic institutions of the nineteenth century. 

It is important to note that patients admitted to a lunatic asylum would be diagnosed according to the symptoms they displayed. As a result, largely due to a lack of understanding of the workings of the brain and how mental illness manifested, conditions were attributed to physical causes. For instance, injuries close to the brain were thought to trigger a breakdown of a person’s mental health. In the casebooks, events such as ‘injury to head from fall on a rock’, were cited as the cause of insanity. In this instance, the patient, Christopher S, had suffered a head injury, which bled profusely at the time, but no one considered it a serious threat to his health. Two years passed before he was admitted to Garlands, which was triggered by the violence towards his wife, to such an extent that she was afraid of him. Less common in the casebooks were explanations of conditions due to ‘moral’ causes, as they were then termed. Anything considered to be caused by a heightened emotional state, for example ‘disappointment in love’, can be found but were much less common. In 1872, in a review of Garlands’ first decade of admissions, Dr Clouston stated that only a quarter of cases were due to emotional trauma. 

The first patient, Joseph T, was admitted to Garlands in November 1882. The cause of his insanity was believed to be ‘worry and hardwork’. Given his occupation, a general practitioner, it can easily be deduced as to why his profession would’ve impacted his health. Before the NHS, GPs were their own enterprises. They worked long hours, travelled great distances to visit patients at home, and had to secure their own business. His case notes also tell us that he was resident in the Crichton Asylum in Dumfries five years earlier, and although he had been discharged recovered, it was noted that he had not felt well since. Interestingly, it was work that aided him whilst under treatment in Garlands. Shortly after admission it was noted that he ‘has gone to work with a party in the grounds’. This was part of the work-based therapy offered in Victorian asylums, as useful occupation was seen to divert patients from their disordered thoughts. A little later on, Joseph’s case notes state that: ‘Is very industrious, says he feels he would break windows etc. if he did not work’. However, it was this outdoor work which also led to his exit from Garlands. After being granted more liberty, due to continuous good behavior, he was placed in charge of one of the working parties, and increasingly given more freedom. This gave him the chance to escape, as detailed in the following passage: 
‘The patient was allowed a considerable amount of liberty and never showed any tendency to abuse this privilege, nor had there been anything unusual in his mental state of late. He went out for a walk between 7 and 8am and he did not appear at meals. A search was instigated for him...’ 
Joseph was never found, or brought back to the asylum, and his body was recovered mere miles from Garlands five weeks later near a quarry, which it was presumed he fell into shortly after his escape. 

Second, cases can be found in the records of patients who experienced delusions to do with work. One example is that of John W, who was admitted to Garlands in February 1897. He was 37, suffering his first attack of insanity which had lasted about a week. The doctors couldn’t find an apparent cause, but noted that he ‘came home from work saying there was a conspiracy against him and refused to go back’. Under ‘delusions’ it was also recorded: ‘says there was a conspiracy against him by fellow workmen and that part of it is to bring him here’. John remained in Garlands for 6 months, and was discharged as recovered as his delusions abated.

The final case to be presented demonstrates that a lack of work could also be a cause of mental breakdown. Richard A was brought to Garlands on 4 October 1862, and was said to have been driven insane by his ‘anxiety of mind for want of work’.  He lacked a hereditary predisposition to the illness, therefore the cause of Richard’s mental instability was attributed to his lack of work and food. Within six weeks Richard was discharged as recovered, restored to full health simply by eating, sleeping well, and being usefully employed in the Asylum workshop.  Here we can clearly see that periods of economic decline, specifically in agriculture, effected, not just a person’s income, but also their mental health. Farmers and casual agricultural labourers were at times merely surviving, and, in some cases, the threat of losing work, or being without an occupation, was enough to trigger insanity. 

Thank you for taking the time to read this post. If you would like to read more of my research on the Garland Asylum, my thesis is freely available to view online: https://leicester.figshare.com/articles/The_Circulation_of_the_Insane_The_Pauper_Lunatic_Experience_of_the_Garlands_Asylum_1862-1913/10226480 

For more information about mental health, talking about mental illness, and support, visit https://www.time-to-change.org.uk/ 

Friday, 9 August 2019

Before the Asylum: Provision for Cumbria’s Mentally Ill pre-1862


So far my posts have focussed on the experience of pauper lunatics admitted to Garlands from its opening in 1862 and onwards throughout the nineteenth-century. This time I shall explore what happened to those who required specialist treatment before Cumberland and Westmorland provided its own lunatic institution. I shall present some examples of pauper patients who received treatment elsewhere to demonstrate some of the responses that existed.

With the implementation of the 1845 Lunacy Act, all persons classified as of unsound mind had to be regularly inspected, by the local Poor Law relieving officers, who reported to the Commissioners in Lunacy, a nationwide body who presided over the care of the insane. Whether people were living at home under the care of relatives, in a workhouse or asylum, they had to be regularly visited to ensure they were not a risk to themselves or others. For patients in institutions, they would also be frequently inspected by the Commissioners in Lunacy, to ensure the establishments were providing acceptable levels of care, and the outcomes of these visits were recorded in their annual reports.

For those in Cumberland and Westmorland, pre-1862, there was no specialist provision in either county. Therefore, paupers needing asylum treatment would be sent to county institutions over in the North East. Most commonly used was the Dunston Lodge private Asylum just outside Gateshead. Usually, only the cases requiring constant supervision were taken such a distance to receive treatment, and they were sometimes the ones who posed the greatest risk to themselves or others.

One example, found in the Cockermouth Poor Law Union correspondence of January 1860 (The National Archives -TNA, MH12/1631) was Joseph L, who had been resident in Dunston Lodge since January 1855, at a charge to the Union of 10 shillings and sixpence per week. He was described as a lunatic, aged 45 from Keswick, and was listed along with thirteen others chargeable to Cockermouth Union that were present in Dunston Lodge. There were also a small number of others under treatment in Gateshead Fell and Bensham Asylums.

If cases were not classed as requiring asylum treatment, then individuals could be admitted to the local workhouse to be treated in their infirmary wards. Alternatively, for people who had willing, and able, relatives to look after them, they could reside at home, and the families would receive a small sum of money from the Poor Law Union to help with their upkeep, if they required it. For instance, in the Penrith Poor Law Union lunatic returns for January 1860, Mary B, aged 32 from Plumpton was listed as living in Penrith with her mother, who received five shillings per week to assist with her maintenance. The cases who typically resided with relatives were those classed as an ‘idiot’, which was used to denote life-long, incurable mental disabilities, and they were often cases who posed little risk to themselves or others.

In some cases, the returns list details individuals classed as mentally unsound who were living on their own and receiving maintenance. For instance, the East Ward Union returns for January 1858, details Alice W who was listed as living alone in Kirkby Stephen. She was 73, classed as a lunatic who had been of unsound mind for the previous 30 years, and was receiving maintenance of 2 shillings and sixpence per week. There seems to have been a little concern for her ability to reside at home, but a follow up inspection concluded: ‘She has resided in the same cottage for the space of 36 years which she keeps very clean and tidy and she appears to be very comfortable…she is quite safe alone.’ (TNA, MH12/13566)

Finally, individuals could also reside in the Union workhouse. One case which sparked some interest in the East Ward Union was that of an old man in the workhouse at Kirkby Stephen who was noticed on a visit by the inspectors in March 1858 to not be clothed in the workhouse dress, and was instead wearing his own clothes. This attracted attention because on admission, workhouse inmates would be given union clothing to wear, mainly so that their own garments could be de-loused. Therefore, the Poor Law Board inspectors found this quite odd. Further correspondence provided the explanation: ‘James R…the old man in question, was formerly a farmer in the township of Waitby…subsequently of his giving up his farm he lived alone in a cottage in the village of Waitby. But the 20th of June 1856 on which the Relieving Officer received information that he was not in a fit state to take care of himself and was wandering on a moor some miles from his home. The Relieving Officer went in search of him and found him in a state of imbecility and brought him to the Workhouse…the old man had a sum of money concealed upon him…Forty pounds…the old man’s nearest relatives…agreed that the money should be placed in a bank and if the Guardians would allow him to remain in the workhouse, he would pay for his maintenance’ (TNA, MH12/13566). Thus, as he was paying his own way, he was allowed to stay, and in his own clothes. As he was incapable of looking after himself, the workhouse was a viable option for his care, and ensured that he did not have to be removed and treated a great distance away from his home and his relatives.

If you have enjoyed reading this post, and the rest of my blog, my thesis about the Garlands Asylum and it’s patients is available to view freely by clicking this link - https://lra.le.ac.uk/handle/2381/44377. It begins by recounting what happened once the Asylum opened, as patients previously sent large distances to be treated could be cared for much closer to home, allowing relatives to maintain contact. The main focus is analysing how, and why, patients were frequently transferred between some of the responses to insanity discussed in this post, and the effects it had on those who experienced it.

Also available to buy/download is the volume I co-edited – Family Life in Britain, 1650-1910. Chapter 7 centres on how the family remained in contact with relatives who were under treatment in Garlands, and explores their role in the process. Other chapters of interwst look at varying aspects of family life throughout history and attempts to reconfigure our understanding of the family unit and their coping mechanisms in times of strife. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Family-Britain-1650-1910-Carol-Beardmore/dp/3030048543/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=family+life+in+britain&qid=1565371658&s=gateway&sr=8-2